Review: Star Boundby Jeff Foust
|
“Neil obtained secular sainthood. Buzz became the space community’s problem child, subject to almost as much eye rolling as reverence, beloved but bewildering, a deity best experienced in small doses.” |
The book follows a roughly chronological path from Robert Goddard to the present day, providing the reader with an overview of spaceflight without assuming they know much about it. It’s written in an approachable, occasionally irreverent tone, interspersed with top ten (actually, top eleven) lists from NASA’s coolest astronauts to the best space books and movies.
The book doesn’t take itself too seriously, but it can be serious, and even poignant. An example is a passage contrasting the post-Apollo 11 careers of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin: “Neil obtained secular sainthood. Buzz became the space community’s problem child, subject to almost as much eye rolling as reverence, beloved but bewildering, a deity best experienced in small doses. A trip to the moon could change a man. But maybe it could also lock him into place.”
Any wide-ranging history of a subject requires decisions on what to include and emphasize and what to exclude or deemphasize. In Star Bound, there is a strong emphasis on human spaceflight, with chapters on program from Mercury to Artemis. There is far less, though, on robotic missions. A chapter on “Probes, Rovers, and the Golden Records” spends less than ten pages on Mariner 9, Pioneers 10 and 11, Landsat, Viking 1 and 2, and Voyager 1 and 2. Not a rover among them.
There is also an emphasis more on the early space program than more recent accomplishments. While Skylab merits a full chapter, the International Space Station gets only a couple pages, part of a chapter on cooperation between the US and Russia after the Cold War. That emphasis borders on nostalgia: “If one were asked to choose a year or two from its history as the best time in which to live in the United States, the midsixties would be a smart pick,” the authors argue. (They hastily add, “Not for everyone, of course—and not in every regard.”)
Space aficionados might have once agreed with that statement, given all the achievements and activity of the 1960s. But today is, arguably, a more exciting time, with space far more active and accessible. One wonders if future spaceflight historians of the latter 21st century will look back on our current era as a step towards bigger and more ambitious efforts, or with nostalgia as a better, vanished time.
Note: we are now moderating comments. There will be a delay in posting comments and no guarantee that all submitted comments will be posted.